Thursday, March 26, 2009

Tacoma Narrows Bridge - Addressing Misconceptions

A great paper on how most undergraduate physics texts have described the collapse of the infamous bridge erroneously, over simplifying it to a case of forced resonance. The author of the article, Robert H. Scanlan, describes how the bridge failed due to 'aeroelastic flutter' -Good read. 

http://www.ketchum.org/billah/Billah-Scanlan.pdf


-k

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Equation 16.42 - Raymer 4th Edition


I went through Raymer and a couple of other texts (Stengel, Etkin, etc.) and I it's my understanding that the negative term in eqn 16.42 represents 'propeller fin effect' (Etkin eqn.3.9,8) and is destabilizing for a conventional tractor config. 

The term in question, dBp/dB, is analogous to d(alpha)p/d(alpha), which is seen is eqn 16.30 (Raymer) which is the upwash derivative if the engine is in front of the wings. Similarly, dBp/dB, is probably the sidewash derivative wrt to the prop. 

For a single engine tractor configuration the vertical tail is considered far aft, so that dBp/dB is equal to one. I got this value from a colleague, so there is no text I can point to. Raymer doesn't define this term anywhere. 

I'd appreciate  constructive feedback.

-k


F-22 Crashes near Edwards AFB

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Control Systems Basics

A friend pointed me to North Dakota State University's (NDSU) site as a reference for Control Systems fundamentals. 

The course is available for download in .pdf form complete with lecture notes, worked out examples and diagrams.


-k

Friday, March 6, 2009

Kalman Filtering

One of the more interesting control systems topics,


"The Kalman filter has two distinct phases: Predict and Update. The predict phase uses the state estimate from the previous timestep to produce an estimate of the state at the current timestep. In the update phase, measurement information at the current timestep is used to refine this prediction to arrive at a new, (hopefully) more accurate state estimate, again for the current timestep."


Basics --> http://www.cs.unc.edu/~welch/media/pdf/maybeck_ch1.pdf


More --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalman_filter


http://www.elo.utfsm.cl/~ipd481/Papers%20varios/kalman1960.pdf


http://www.cs.unc.edu/~welch/media/pdf/kalman_intro.pdf

Monday, February 16, 2009


From 'Flightglobal.com':
NTSB: Colgan 3407 pitched up despite anti-stall push
- John Croft
Flight data recorder information shows the Colgan Air Q400 that crashed in Buffalo Thursday night pitched 31 degrees nose-up after stick shaker and stick pusher systems activated at the start of the instrument approach.
The events occurred as the crew began configuring the twin-engine turboprop for landing in light to moderate icing and snow conditions.
According to National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) member Steven Chealander, data shows that the stick shaker and stick pusher activated roughly 34 seconds after the landing gear was deployed and as the wing flaps transitioned between 5 and 10 degrees down. The pilots had commanded the flaps to the 15 degree down position.
A “reference speed increase” switch that increases by 20kt the speed at which the stall warning system activates had been set to the ON position by the pilots as called for in icing conditions, says Chealander. The crew turned on the aircraft’s automatic de-icing system shortly after departure from Newark. Flight 3407, flying as Continental Connection, crashed into a house about 5mi from the airport, killing all 49 on board and one person in the house.
Chealander says aircraft had been flying in autopilot mode until the stick shaker activated, an action that automatically disengaged the system. The stick pusher follows the stick shaker if the aircraft continues to approach an aerodynamic stall, driving the control column forward to decrease the angle-of-attach and wing loading. The stick pusher is designed so that pilots can overpower it however.
While the NTSB has recommended that pilots hand flying their aircraft in icing conditions to get a better sense for trim changes, Chealander says the US Federal Aviation Administration has not mandated the practice, in part due considerations over pilot workload in such conditions without the use of autopilot.
Further, he says that Bombardier, the manufacturer of the Q400, recommends hand flying only if icing conditions are severe. “From what we’ve seen so far, we haven’t determined there was severe icing,” he says.
Investigators are still in the process of determining what the aircraft’s stall speed would have been for its weight and configuration, says Chealander. Flight data recorder (FDR) information shows the aircraft was flying at a calibrated airspeed of 134kt just before the landing gear was deployed.
Following the initial pitch upset to 31 degrees nose up, Chealander says the aircraft experienced a nose-down pitch of 45 degrees with a roll to the left of 46 degrees. The Q400 then rolled right to 105 degrees. Engine power was increased to full-power about 6 seconds after the upset. The pilots  had commanded the flaps and landing gear to retract after the upset.
The last data point from the FDR, captured when the aircraft was approximately 250ft above the ground, showed a heading of 53 degrees (magnetic), a 26-degree right roll, 30 degree nose-down attitude and a speed of 100kt, says Chealander.
Radar data from air traffic control showed a descent rate of 9,600fpm between approximately 1,150ft and 350ft above the ground.
Chealander says the G-forces during the final minute of the flight ranged from 0.75G to 2G.

Friday, February 13, 2009

DATCOM wing-body analysis

It appears DATCOM is using a wing-body analysis method regardless of the aspect ratio.